The 4 Theses Of Sujit Choudhry About Constitutional Resilience In The Face Of A Populist Challenge

Sujit Choudhry is an internationally recognized figure when it comes to comparative constitutional law, having worked as an advisor to constitution building processes, governance, as well as rule of law processes for more than 2 decades in places such as Jordan, Egypt, Ukraine, South Africa, and more. He spoke or gave lectures in 30 countries, sometimes working during ceasefires or conditions of political violence. He has experience in technical advice to multi-party dialogues, leading stakeholder consultations, facilitating public dialogue sessions with stakeholders and civil society groups, drafting technical reports, engaging party leaders and parliamentarians, training civil servants and bureaucrats, and performing detailed advisory work.

Recently, he shared his thoughts in regards to the idea of enhancing the resilience of a constitution in order to ensure that it survives in the face of a populist challenge, setting out his argument in 4 theses. Before outlining his theses, he mentioned Mattias Kumm, who, as he points out, argues that the populist challenge to constitutional democracy is ‘systemic’, due to the fact that its not targeting one of the core features of constitutional democracy, but instead it is aiming at all of them. Sujit Choudhry notes that according to Kumm, populists deny the idea of legitimate opposition as well as the claim that pluralism is politics’ normal condition.

His first thesis begins with a plea for modesty, noting that constitutional democrats have to be realistic and clear-eyed about what good constitutional design can achieve. Mr. Choudhry considers that we have to steer a middle course between constitutional nihilism and constitutional idealism. Idealists argue that good constitutional design can largely eliminate the risk that populism poses, where as constitutional nihilists argue that there is little (if anything) that the constitutional design is capable of doing to secure a victory when facing a populist challenge.

The second thesis that he brings up is the idea that the challenge that populism poses to constitutional democracy is widespread but also misunderstood. He notes that commentators often times are conflating autocrats with populists. He points out that populists are different, due to the fact that they are claiming to represent a true electoral majority, and in some cases they might genuinely command support from the majority, even conditions of competitions are fair and free. The distinction between populists and autocrats, according to Mr. Choudhry, has important implications when it comes to the goals and means of constitutional resilience.

The third point that he raises notes that we should distinguish between two ideas of constitutional resilience. On one side there’s the view which considers the threats to constitutional democracy to be coming from populist political mobilization, with politics being seen in a negative light, and on the other side there’s the view which argues that constitutional stability rests on a political foundation of power relations, and that the constitutions are providing infrastructure for a partisan and pluralist contestation. He considers that turning our back upon politics will undermine constitutional order in the long run in the face of populist challenge.

The forth and final thesis of Sujit Choudhry states that if constitutional resilience has constitutional infrastructure for political competition at its heart, then we should be broadening the institutional viewfinder of constitutional law behind its narrow focus on electoral system design. He brings up the fact that Polish contributors to the workshop have highlighted the weakening of opposing rights when it comes to the legislative process, which has been an important dimension in regards to democratic backsliding. Constitutional designers have imagined the idea of opposing rights in terms of voting rules, but they are also encompassing other tools, such as agenda-setting, oversight powers, committee chairs, etc.

Find out more here http://www.dougsandler.com/news/sujit-choudhry

Aaron Lupuloff Is Inspiring Young Minds And His Community

Anyone can make a difference in a child’s life. The educational system is a perfect way to get your foot in the door to inspire young minds. This can take place in really any community, all over the world. One man is working to better his community through a charity he founded for school kids. They work on a number of projects to inspire, educate, and uplift the local school system.

Aaron Lupuloff works at Gwinnett County Public Schools Foundation as the founder and senior executive director. He has worked in this position for the past three years in Norcross, Georgia. This charity not only elevates the standard of education in the area, but also provides financial assistance to educational programs around the area. They hep develop leadership, fund scholarships, innovate, ensure student success, and so much more. They just really want to support learning and teaching in any capacity they can. Mr. Lupuloff is very committed to the betterment of his community, especially when it comes to youth.

Aaron brings his ideas to life by surrounding himself with a small group and some brainstorming. They call it their whiteboard sessions in which they discuss any topics, ideas, and thoughts they have. In addition, the small team relies on a trusted group of community activists that can impact their wisdom from a variety of backgrounds to the team. There is a new trend that is impacting the educational system that is changing things for the better. This trend focuses the challenging students first, which creates a more successful environment for all the students.

A typical day for the senior executive starts by tackling everything from funding scholarships, to improving student achievement, empowering students, and so much more. They really try to focus on the greatest need first, before getting to the other stuff. Asking people in the community for their opinions on educational matters is what makes Aaron Lupuloff more productive. This means not only asking those who are the most wealthy or powerful, but everyone no matter their background or situation.

According to gwinnettdailypost, one sentiment that the education expert believes is not to be afraid to fail, even if it’s many times. If you don’t give up, eventually you will succeed. If Aaron could give his younger self some advice, it would be to be more humble and patient. He would also remind himself to ask other for help when he needed it. No one can do everything themselves. It’s important to work with others to achieve goals. Another thing Mr. Lupuloff would recommends others to do more of is communicate. There can always be more communication in the world.

Aaron regularly uses one web services that has paid off in spades. It is Bloomberg. It’s connected to finances and Wall Street. This resource helps him stay informed about how to raise money the smart way for his charity. There is one book Aaron Lupuloff read and is incredibly inspired by. It shows that anyone from any background can change their life and help others succeed. It’s called “The Change Agent” by Damon West.

https://gazetteday.com/2019/03/aaron-lupuloff-addresses-evolution-school-environments/

 

 

Robert Deignan Describes the Trickiness of Running a Business

One thing that many entrepreneurs would admit is that running a business is not completely logical. There are certain areas in business that are not going to work in the way one thinks it should. One thing that Robert Deignan has learned is that things may go better if he relies on his gut instinct. He describes the many days and times when he has gone against his gut feeling. One thing he talks about is when he is doing something that he believes in intuitively, he has many thoughts in his head about why it is not going to work.

When it comes to gut instinct, Robert Deignan has learned that in some cases, it is a matter of time. The effect of which way one goes when it comes to his intuition is not always immediate. For instance, he talks about times when he has gone against his gut instinct and eventually learned why it was not the right way to go. This has been a good lesson to follow when it comes to his gut instinct. It often happens that people go in a direction that did not feel right and then find out why it didn’t. Robert also shares times when something felt right and he didn’t go for it only to realize that he should’ve taken this direction.

Robert Deignan has shown that there is a lot of room in business for intuition. While things may look good on paper, it is not always an indication that it is going to turn out well. This is especially useful when it comes to hiring someone. There are people who have all of the qualifications but are otherwise not good for the position or the company that they are applying for. Robert has learned how to protect his business and keep it growing and prospering.

 

https://www.inthebite.com/2016/01/79th-silver-sailfish-derby-starts-tomorrow/